Government is more likely to pass additional restrictions or increase taxes on smoking, fast food, etc. There would be no need for maintaining insurance information or wasting time submitting claims.
Access to health care then, is also really important.
Doctors must practice defensive medicine to avoid getting sued. It is a legal question but also a conceptual one that says a lot about where we are as a nation today, especially in the political realm.
Some physicians are even leaving the profession rather than deal with all these non-medical headaches. Because no one should go bankrupt when they get sick. For more information, please visit www. This is why you always have to fill out a lengthy health history whenever you go to a new physician.
The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are arguably the most important and seminal documents in the history of mankind, and in their powerful wisdom, guidebooks for a free nation.
Anyone with an expensive illness or disease must then often face one of two choices: Since health care premiums Free healthcare should be universal to grow at several times the rate of inflation, many businesses are simply choosing to not offer a health plan, or if they do, to pass on more of the cost to employees.
The main argument against a centralized database is that certain insurance providers may deny coverage if they find certain past medical problems.
Thus, health problems that could be caught at an early stage or prevented altogether become major illnesses. Because health transforms communities, economies and nations.
Tax Code handling something as complex as health care? The number of uninsured U. The reasonable answer, of course, is no. A long, painful transition will have to take place involving lost insurance industry jobs, business closures, and new patient record creation.
In fact, the only real hurdle to achieving health care for everyone, and better health care overall, is a stubborn and ideologically driven belief in the exact wording of our founding documents without acknowledgement of the spirit of those documents.
Healthy people who take care of themselves will have to pay for the burden of those who smoke, are obese, etc. Doctors have to take classes now simply to understand all the insurance plans out there; they are often restricted by insurance practices, such as what tests can be ordered.
Universal health care provides these opportunities. Profit motives, competition, and individual ingenuity have always led to greater cost control and effectiveness. However, if the government is paying for everything, that should never be a problem.
A government-provided system would remove the disincentive patients have for visiting a medical professional. However, any costs not covered by insurance must be absorbed by all the rest of us, which means even higher premiums.
Well, it means that every person, everywhere, has access to quality healthcare without suffering financial hardship. The reason that Americans are so divided on this issue is that the right to good health which can only be ensured through guaranteed health care is not mentioned in any of our founding documents.
Medical professionals can concentrate on healing the patient rather than on insurance procedures, malpractice liability, etc. Doctors need accurate information to make a proper diagnosis.
Last of all, separate systems means we have a tougher time analyzing data at a national level.
Unlike life, liberty, and happiness, which are protected by the Declaration of Independence, or the right to free speech, which is protected by the Constitution, our health is seemingly on its own, and therein lies the problem.
This not only affects the health of the patient but the overall cost of the system, since preventive medicine costs only a small fraction of a full blown disease. Because many people are uninsured and those that do have insurance face high deductibles, Americans often forego doctor visits for minor health problems or for preventive medicine.
Government-mandated procedures will likely reduce doctor flexibility and lead to poor patient care. Lack of affordable, quality health care traps families and nations in poverty.
The Founding Fathers would never have stayed silent on an important issue like the preservation of our health, but the fact is that during their own lifetime, the problem of astronomical health care costs had not yet emerged, and so it was not the urgent challenge that it is today.
Because health is a right, not a privilege.Dec 29, · The government should protect individuals’ ability to seek insurance in a free market, not seek to provide insurance for them. Pros and Cons of Universal Health Care Healthcare is a basic need of every human being.
It should be considered a basic human right, in which the nation ensures that every person is covered by equal healthcare, regardless of age, gender, or income. universal health care should be a right. Everyone deserves medical care to be free it should be a public benefit rather than a profitability the people don't get care because they cant afford the co pays many time they the to go to the emergency rooms and latter cant afford to pat the bill insurance is just going to get higher and higher.
The ACA deserves a chance, but more importantly, universal health care deserves a chance. Good health is an inalienable right, even if it does not say so in print. SANJAY SANGHOEE is a political. Free universal healthcare papers, essays, and research papers. Many European countries with a universal right to health care, such as Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy, have a lower Gross Domestic Product but they should never have a right to receive health care free of charge.
Health care is a service that should be paid for, not a right.Download